SCOTLAND'S fox hunting legislation has suffered another major setback after two Borders huntsmen were cleared following a five-day trial.
Buccleuch Hunt members 41-year-old Timothy Allen and Shaun Anderson, who is 28, were charged with deliberately hunting a fox with a pack of dogs.
But both were found not guilty at different stages of the trial for an offence which was alleged to have happened on land surrounding Whitton Farm, near Morebattle, on December 20 last year.
The trial at Jedburgh Sheriff Court centered on video footage covertly filmed by investigators from the League Against Cruel Sports during which it was claimed the huntsmen breached the terms of the Protection of Wild Mammals(Scotland) Act 2002.
An exemption in the Act permits hounds to search for foxes and then "flush" them to waiting gunmen who would shoot them to avoid a chase.
Sheriff Peter Paterson was critical of the wording of the current legislation when it came to searching and flushing of foxes.
Following legal submissions he found there was no case to answer against huntmaster Allen as there was no fox shown in the part of the video he featured in and therefore no need for waiting guns.
Accordingly he found Allen of Eildon, near Melrose, not guilty of the charge and told him he was free to leave the dock.
The trial of "whipper-in" Anderson continued and during his evidence he said he made every attempt to control the dogs when a fox emerged.
Sheriff Paterson ruled that the word deliberately meant Anderson intended to commit the offence of flushing the fox for dogs to chase but he added that after considering the evidence the Crown had failed to prove this and there was a reasonable doubt.
He told Anderson:"It is an offence when you deliberately allow the chase. That is what the legislation is all about but it was your intention to stop the chase."
Sheriff Paterson added that for those reasons he found Anderson not guilty.
Following the verdict Jamie Stewart, director of the Scottish Countryside Alliance said: "Clearly we are pleased that both Mr Allen and Mr Anderson have been found not guilty of the charge against them.
"It is frustrating when cases end up in court with little or no evidence against them.
"We welcome Sheriff Paterson's judgement and hope it is taken into account in the future."
Robbie Marsland, director of the League Against Cruel Sports said:"This case highlights how the legislation needs to be strengthened and does not work at the moment.
"As has been the case on a number of occasions in the past, failings in the law which supposedly bans hunting in Scotland have made prosecution extremely difficult.
"Today's outcome simply reinforces our view that the law is not fit for purpose and isn't worth the paper it is written on.
"We hope today will act as a wake up call to the Scottish Government that it must act now to improve the law."
He said the flushing to gun exemption needed to be removed from the Act and the number of dogs that are present reduced to two.
In the 16 years since the Act was introduced north of the border, there has been only one successful prosecution for mounted fox hunting.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article